Friday, January 14, 2011

Milena Velba In A Farm

"Sex and the City: The Movie." For fans of the show.

Review / opinion of the film:


Sarah Jessica Parker, Kim Catrall , Kristin Davis and Cynthia Nixon , all still there being Carrie, Samantha , Charlotte and Miranda , being New Yorkers and inseparable. Weddings, children, lovers, love, heartbreak, laughter, tears, passion, everything ... Em ocionante, fun, cool, and describe " Sex and the City: The Movie ." It fitting end, the end I needed the series that kept me glued to the TV and still keeps me here . The beginning of the film, though necessary, is somewhat loose, but then takes a running start and for me, total follower and lover of the series, the film hooks you, the pace is great, you get to dip into the lives of these four women's history.
has moments of brutal laughter, sadness, tension and a lot of emotion. But there is a fundamental truth in all this, to enjoy this film, one must have seen the series and is also perfect addition you liked the series really is true that initially there is a kind of summary or "Previously on", but impossible to summarize all six seasons that someone out I have not seen the film there is a hint of how informative are the girls and how their lives, if you have not seen the series does not bring forth all the juice these 148 minutes, some critics branded as too long, because I missed an hour of truth !..., are really just minutes, gives the sensation that is compensable fans of the series making a movie so long, as saying " after all this time we are going to give a gift ."

The characters are the same, I mean that the time has changed, only modified part of their lives but its essence is the same and by that I mean that the expanded format is practically the same as the series, but modified to work in film ... and it works.

What I can say? When I saw the film, I left happy, I needed an end, other than that of broadcast television, I needed to see the end after the "final chapter", because those who have confirmaréis series followed what I say, the end of the sixth season is somewhat open so that needed to be a point and followed at the time when I saw the movie, I thought perhaps it was a good point or point and followed and finally, because of course you may make a second part (which ultimately did as you probably know) spoil the climax and I do not really care whether they were able to not overstretch the product with the risk of ruining but for me it was fine, my box (literally) of shoes and the movie with the end of the story, there is only one detail not to rebel (It would be too telling) that seemed a little "going to leave it? Joooooo" but that detail is secondary. So you see it and do you find your own conclusion and I hope you like it.

And a story, before the screening at a film that was in the summer of 2008, before the film, as is common place ads and trailers for other films, almost all ads were aimed at women, I was curious because it denoted that they thought female audiences is that in the cinema when I went, though it was the first time and there were four, all were girls. Consider the reality is that targets a predominantly female audience, but I'm sure there are men in the world who like to see the stories of these four women, and maybe a few others could learn something about ourselves, no no, I know not that they represent for example the half English girl, but at least represent four types of women, leaving part of having a social life Amario incredible and full of shoes, in addition to it is Miranda which has less of everything. And another thing I could not help leaving the cinema and go shopping for clothes, ay tried to hold back but I was totally possessed by a spirit wasteful, I asked what the body needed to spend "my money" in order to be really cute clothes of death.

By the way, for me Samantha is still the most, with no adjectives, I would like to be as "Samantha Jones" and if we like Kim Cattrall.

Ah! and a rumor or not so rumor went before and during the shooting of the film, said Sarah Jessica Parker and Kim Catrall , had problems because Catrall said they should all earn the same as Sarah Jessica Parker , which should not have been differences antre them because they were all equally important, in the end after many leaks to the press, agreed, did not become to raise the issue and came to fruition with the film.

could talk about the second film to be released this summer, but although I liked, I must say that I only liked it because I am a total fan, but if you analyze the movie ... Buff is one of total, anyway maybe talk about it later. On the issue of whether there will be any third party, at first gave a resounding NO for an answer, but we'll see. Possibly later discuss each of the players and their character.

I said the first part was fitting end, I needed to finish the series that has kept me glued to the TV and still keeps me here .

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Calculating Hor'doerves

Who is the best director of all time and why? Reese

That made me question a while ago and has given me to debate, since that is too broad a question how to choose just one director? is almost impossible because There are so many different ways of filmmaking, genius in some aspect of management, although of course there are also those who can not make the O with a joint, I know there are directors who have a weight on his behalf, which can not Revata , but movies can be compared with each other?.

For me one of the best things you can review a director is his dominance in regard to directing the actors, some perhaps the only real rule, a good director of actors, and much note when an actor is mediocre or not able to draw from itself to its full potential, something that if the director is not good at it, what happens happens, who does that? such as Pedro Almodóvar does , uses his actors like puppets, at will, the moves by the footage and fully fit and still be normally hard and complex stories, like because everything is fine yarn.

Others are able to do really amazing work, are what I call entertainment directors who? Wachowski Brothers as , because although I do not see them doing a Hamlet , nobody can say no are great film directors of a cult show and also as Matrix , innovative and offenders, they are noteworthy, indeed, made history by doing this saga, now many of its innovations are used in many other films There are many films that they reveal.

A very clear example of something quite contrary to this is Gus Van Sant , one of my favorites, makes independent films are groundbreaking films at the box office, he tells stories without an exorbitant budget, but do not need, just choose a story and puts it in a very particular, creating aesthetically beautiful works despite being normally heartbreaking stories, I know the work of the director not reach everybody, but nobody can say it's a bad director, just has opted for a type of film, non-commercial and is another who can say it's a great actor's director.

And you can not believe that a film can is great for just the director, when a film like "The Godfather " comes round and reaches our times no a bad age, yes of course clear is Francis Ford Coppola , no doubt about it, but also by an entire team, from the casting team although Mr. Coppola and producers decided that the heavyweights tape were those who were behind a lot of players who correctly went through a casting equipment, and other details that are well chosen, why leave a great movie? because everything is taken care, music, costumes, sets, script, actors, direction, so can you say that " Godfather" Coppola is great for ? yes but it's great for the complete package of the film, with a person who knows where it goes and where to go, making everything is flawless, leading the team and players well.

Why so fond of Woody Allen ? is clear to me, because his films (almost all) stories are surreal, sometimes with famous actors and sometimes he did reach the top actors who chose to become the same, because their stories are well told despite be some continuity of surreal, as I said in fact his films are simple, but with a history complex. Moreover, for example I like films more when he himself uses as an actor and why the image does not sell anything, and that beauty has little, but it does have something I like and also fits into the stories and characters written for him and knows what she wants out of himself. Now if I have clear is that Mr. Allen be different and is a curiously strange, something that is implicit in all his films, for me anyway a genius.

But beware that not all directors can make some those who reserve a character for herself are more expendable, a clear case is Quentin Tarantino, creating great movies, but bad enough as an actor. Anyway, his films are so great and you grab the papers so that they can book are like a wink to his audience, because we, his character in "Pulp Fiction " natural or credible is it? 're seeing Quentin Tarantino and now.

There is perhaps a case and is contrary to previous Clint Eastwood, because for me as actor was gradually improving, but the truth is that no gesture features are the best, but I must admit that it is far better when it has to lead and go, doing the occasional gem of cinema. That happens as well with Mel Gibson that is proving to be a very good director, as an actor was not bad but spent more for being a pretty face.

Just do not always have to have a name from a project that becomes a success, worship or any of the variants to tell God that movie! simply there are films that came to our days or jumping today as a total success, without names on the front or at least not remembered these great among the greats. I still think it is almost impossible to compare the works of the great, how do you compare the "Godfather", "Balde Runner" or "Some Like It Hot"? What do they have to do together? therefore do not think you can choose a director from so many that are possible.

So how do you choose just one? is almost impossible. Should I choose? Alfred Hitchcock as tell , Steven Spielberg, Francis Ford Copppola , Stanley Kubrick , Billy Wilder, Woody Allen , Quentin Tarantino, Gus Van Sant , Tim Burton, Alejandro Amenabar , Pedro Almodóvar, Martin Scorsese , M. Night Shyamalan, Coen Brothers ... Did you see? is that I can not.

"You can stay with just one?